Best of Chicago voting is live now. Vote for your favorites »
I’ve just been listening to someone inside the Tribune who’s trying to think it through. (This person’s years and experience add up to a perspective I’ve learned to respect and trust.) Lipinski had been editor seven years already, and Sam Zell and his cowboys were obviously not her style; if she thought of herself as a short-timer why put herself through the agony of deciding who stays and who goes? Yes, but who knows better than she does who’s dispensable and who isn’t, and who better to defend the Tribune‘s highest values than someone who’s spent a career serving them?
But why did she take a vacation in the first place, while everyone around her was working overtime trying to reinvent the paper? This strikes my interlocutor as oddly insensitive. Lipinski had her friends at the Tribune, the celebrated Friends of Ann Marie — or FOAMs — but otherwise, this person says, she was not an impassioning leader. In recent months she’d been no Henry V — or John Carroll or Dean Baquet, fallen leaders at the LA Times remembered for rallying the troops against the barbarians.
Baquet wound up at the LA Times. He became editor in 2005 when John Carroll, his predecessor, quit to protest staff cuts demanded of him, and the next year Baquet refused to make more cuts and was fired. (The publisher who fired him, David Hiller, fell out of favor with Zell and the other new bosses in Chicago and resigned Monday. That development was completely overshadowed here by Lipinski’s resignation.)
And now we have Lipinski’s inscrutable resignation.
